CONSTITUENCY BRIEFING · ENERGYMAP.APP

Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale

MP: David Mundell (Conservative) Scotland Data to July 2026 energymap.app

Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale was paid £15m last year to switch off its wind farms, because the wires south were full. That would cover every local household's electricity for 203 days. A further 913 MW of approved clean power (almost all onshore wind) is still waiting to be built here: enough to supply a year's electricity to 773,000 homes. A 500 MW battery approved at Redshaw Battery Energy Storage in 2025 would store power that is currently wasted; it has not been built. A 200 MW battery was refused planning here in 2026; while discharging it could have supplied about 701,000 homes.

Ranks 2 of 650 for clean power approved and not built; 5 of 19 among seats with visible switch-off payments.

What is stuck, and why

Project and developerTechSizeApprovedWhy it is stuckEarliest
Coalburn II Energy Storage Facility - Battery StoragAlcemi Storage Development Limited Battery
1,000 MW
2024 Under constructionWho can move it: the developer · Planning ref ECU00004698 2027 (in construction)
High Netherfauld House Farm 1, Tower Road - Battery ESB (Harker) Limited Battery
502 MW
Waiting 1.2 years for a planning decisionWho can move it: the Scottish Government (it decides big energy projects) · Planning ref ECU00006063
Redshaw Battery Energy StorageBayWa r.e. UK Limited Battery
500 MW
2025 Still in the grid queue review — no firm connection date yetWho can move it: the grid operator (NESO) · Planning ref ECU00005122 2031
Gretna Green Battery StorageGresham House Devco Pipeline Battery
456 MW
2025 Approved a year ago — nothing has happened sinceWho can move it: the developer and the network company · Planning ref ECU00004986
Scoop Hill Wind FarmCommunity Wind Power Limited Onshore wind 378,000 homes
432 MW
Refused by the Scottish Government (it decides big energy projects) in 2026Who can move it: the Scottish Government (it decides big energy projects) · Planning ref ECU00000533
Lagrae Battery Energy Storage SystemBuccleuch Estates Limited Battery
400 MW
Still in the grid queue review — no firm connection date yetWho can move it: the grid operator (NESO) · Planning ref ECU00004991 2036
Glenmuckloch Pumped Storage HydroBuccleuch Estates Pumped Storage Hydroelectricity
400 MW
2016 Approved 10 years ago — nothing has happened sinceWho can move it: the developer and the network company · Planning ref EC00005236
Red Moss - Battery StorageGreen Switch Capital Limited Battery
342 MW
2025 Still in the grid queue review — no firm connection date yetWho can move it: the grid operator (NESO) · Planning ref ECU00005043 2030

Plus 70 smaller projects — see the full seat page.

What building it would do here

Estimates from published per-MW factors — sources and dates in the method.

Compared with its neighbours

ConstituencyApproved, not builtRunningPaid to switch off
Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale 913 MW1,451 MW£15m
Midlothian 4.2 MW0 MWnot visible
Livingston 118 MW116 MWnot visible
Edinburgh South West 0 MW0 MWnot visible
Carlisle 70 MW49 MWnot visible
Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk 85 MW685 MW£7.0m

Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale has more approved-and-waiting capacity than any of its neighbouring seats.

What to ask

WRITTEN PARLIAMENTARY QUESTION · DEPARTMENT FOR ENERGY SECURITY AND NET ZERO
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what steps she is taking to bring forward the grid connection date for Harestanes Windfarm in Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale, which received planning permission in 2019 and holds a connection offer for 2028.
LETTER TO THE GRID OPERATOR (NESO) AND SP TRANSMISSION
I am writing about Harestanes Windfarm in my constituency of Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale. The project already has planning permission, but cannot connect to the grid until 2028. Please set out what would be required to bring that date forward, whether the project has been considered for an earlier connection, and what my constituents can expect in the meantime.

Constituents can write to David Mundell via WriteToThem, or see what they have said about the grid in Parliament.

Story angles

1. Approved in 2015, connecting in 2028: the wind onshore project in Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale that will wait 13 years for a wire.
2. Approved in 2017, connecting in 2029: the wind onshore project in Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale that will wait 12 years for a wire.
3. Wind farms in Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale were paid £15m last year not to generate — enough to pay for every household here's electricity for 203 days.

Numbers, CSVs and per-seat JSON are free to reuse with attribution to energymap.app. Method and caveats.

Sources. Switch-off payments: Elexon settlement data, 12 months to 31 Jul 2026. Planning: Renewable Energy Planning Database (DESNZ), July 2026. Connection dates: NESO Transmission Entry Capacity register. Bill impact: NESO balancing cost reporting. Households: ONS/NRS/NISRA census. MP: UK Parliament Members API.
How to check any of this. Every project above carries its planning application reference. Search that reference on the council's own planning register for the primary record, including the decision notice and, where a project was refused, the reasons. Statuses here come from the government's planning database (REPD, July 2026 edition), which records the status and date of a decision but not the reasons for it — so this briefing never states why something was refused.
Caveats for this seat. The switch-off figure covers the big wind farms on the national grid only; smaller farms on the local grid are switched off invisibly, so it is a floor. Offshore wind is counted nationally, never per seat. The planning database can run a quarter behind reality.
Generated 25 August 2026 · full method at energymap.app/method